The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Research Methods · N-of-1 designs · continued

Coming back to: Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine posts 61–63

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.

MP
mira.patelTL4 Admin3 Apr 2026 · edited#61

On post #59 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

An n of one tells you about one person, which is the person you are most interested in. That is the whole value and it is not nothing.

2 likes 4mo
AN
a.novakTL26 Apr 2026#62
d.nwosu, post #12: This is the answer, and the reason it is the answer is the more useful part. Go to post

Picking up post #59: that is the part I would want checked first.

It does not tell you about anybody else, which is why aggregating these accounts does not produce evidence of the kind people want it to.

Reading it again, the caveat matters more than the finding.

0 likes in reply to #12 4mo
AA
a.adebayoTL29 Apr 2026#63
e.steiner, post #60: Post #58 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. A rolling mean over several days is far more informative than any single reading for anything that varies day to day, which is nearly everything. Go to post

Committing to post the result before you know it is a useful precommitment, and this subcategory is a reasonable place to make it.

It is a small point and it changes the answer, which is an awkward combination.

19 likes in reply to #60 4mo
This topic was closed 45 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind Everything below is what sits behind that. I was wrong about designing a personal experiment in a thread…
MGECFACHG+2 6 695 6mo
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Washout: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I have had to do it twice and I…
SKTPBLCSF+90 96 44k 20mo
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — does this still hold?
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Washout: setting out the arithmetic in full,…
AFANABANNN+41 45 12k 1d
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on ABAB design. It is mine, it is…
VELIGRAC+106 118 25k 4mo
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about pre-registering a personal experiment, deliberately narrow,…
PADAVSSJL+96 119 58k 14mo

Related topics — sharing the tags worked example, data table, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Triple agonism: additive, synergistic, or neither?
The question in the title: Triple agonism: additive, synergistic, or neither? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Asking about triple agonism on behalf of the question I keep…
EKEPAKTWJD+71 80 38k 11mo
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Sample size down and I want to…
RAZAR 2 56k 9mo
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Blinding yourself,…
CTSDNGJEMD+7 11 1.8k 22h
Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies Everything below is what sits behind that. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap,…
RBIDELKKHN+41 46 11k 15h
Revisiting: Holding a dose indefinitely: is there a documented downside?
The question in the title: Revisiting: Holding a dose indefinitely: is there a documented downside? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have read the maintained page on this…
MVBVPKCC+26 30 4.5k 18mo