Analytics · Home & field testing · continued
Coming back to: Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection posts 91–93
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Thank you for taking the time. That was more work than a reply usually is.
27 likes 9mo
bac_water, post #72: Quantitation is worth one more sentence than it usually gets, and the sentence is the one about how the number was arrived at. Go to post
Molecular tests: DNA or RNA tests are not applicable to peptides, which do not contain nucleic acids. Peptide-specific tests rely on protein recognition, not nucleic-acid detection.
If the premise is wrong, everything after it is decoration.
This topic was referenced in
- What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determineAnalytics › Home & field testing · 2 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…
|
+50 | 56 | 9.8k | 1d |
|
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Collecting what is known about quantitation in one place, because it…
|
+11 | 15 | 27k | 12mo |
|
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — does this still hold?
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Trying to work out what would count as…
|
2 | 22k | 16mo | |
|
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice
On the subject in the title: Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice Working notes rather than a conclusion. I was wrong about reflectance and photometric devices in a thread last spring…
|
2 | 2.2k | 10mo | |
|
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold?
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Comparison of home…
|
+2 | 6 | 15k | 11h |
Related topics — sharing the tags third-party testing, documentation quality, ELISA
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Batch numbers that do not match the vial label — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Batch numbers that do not match the vial label — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Batch numbers is wrong? I ask…
|
+39 | 43 | 14k | 1mo |
|
About the Vendor reports category
Structured reports on named suppliers. Batch, date, method and document, or it stays in the unverified column. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
|
4 | 65k | 18mo | |
|
Pricing far outside the range, in either direction
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Pricing far outside the range, in either direction Everything below is what sits behind that. A question about pricing far outside the range that I think has a…
|
+3 | 7 | 27k | 7mo |
|
About the Red flags category
Patterns that reliably precede a problem. Documented, dated, and free of accusation without evidence. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
|
4 | 57k | 17mo | |
|
Coming back to: Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist
On the subject in the title: Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist Working notes rather than a conclusion. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I would…
|
+7 | 11 | 2.6k | 7mo |