This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Post #59 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
That is the honest state of it as of this week.
Taking post #59 at face value and following it one step further.
Units. Everything needs units. This is why we ask every single time. I have seen the same arithmetic done three different ways depending on whether the person was thinking mg/mL or mg/dose or something else entirely. Stating the units makes that impossible.
The reasoning is more useful than the number, which is why I have shown it.
Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you feel, your hopes for the outcome, your medical history beyond what affects this specific question. The first set gets you answered. The second set makes the reply longer without making it better.
Disagreeing with an answer you got: cite what you disagree with, say what contradicts it, and ask which one holds. Do not open with "I think you are wrong". Lead with the evidence.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
Chromatography questions need the method before anything else: column, gradient, wavelength, injection volume. A purity figure with no method attached cannot be discussed, only repeated.
This follows post #70 rather than contradicting it.
Timeline questions need the timeline. Dates, in order, with what happened on each. "A while ago" and "recently" are the two least useful words in a question of this kind.
Happy to expand any of that if it is the useful part.
Worth separating two things that post #68 runs together.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
Scoping that to what I have actually seen rather than what I have read.
Asking a follow-up: new topic or reply in the old one? If the answer depends on the previous post, reply. If it is a question that makes sense without the previous post, new topic. The second gets faster answers.
That is my reading. Someone else read the same page differently and was reasonable.
Post #73 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.
Tag your own topic. Two accurate tags do more for how findable it is than a long title, and you can change them later.
I would want a second opinion before relying on that.
Say what you have already ruled out. "It is not the diluent because I tried a second vial from a different box" saves three replies suggesting the diluent.
Edit the first post rather than adding the missing detail in reply nine. People arriving later read the first post and stop.
This is where my knowledge stops and I would rather mark the edge than blur it.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
I have written this out at length because the short version keeps being misread.
Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you feel, your hopes for the outcome, your medical history beyond what affects this specific question. The first set gets you answered. The second set makes the reply longer without making it better.
A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.
Post #82 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.
Post the arithmetic you already did. Half the questions here are answered by someone spotting which line of your working is wrong, and that is impossible if you only give the answer you got.
That is what I would do. It may not be what is correct.
Adding the measurement that post #85 says would settle it.
Disagreement-style questions: "I read this and it contradicts what I heard here, which is right?" is answerable. "Is this a bad idea?" without giving the context is not.
That is the shape of it. The detail is where I would expect to be corrected.
Chromatography questions need the method before anything else: column, gradient, wavelength, injection volume. A purity figure with no method attached cannot be discussed, only repeated.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Why "any advice?" is the least effective ending for a post — the long version
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why "any advice?" is the least effective ending for a post — the long version Counting it rather than describing it, because the count is the part…
|
+79 | 83 | 1.6k | 9mo |
|
Rewriting my first post: a before-and-after, with commentary
Rewriting my first post: a before-and-after, with commentary Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I want to check my reasoning rather than get a conclusion. My…
|
3 | 2.7k | 4mo | |
|
What to include when your question involves a laboratory result
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to include when your question involves a laboratory result Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
|
+8 | 12 | 14k | 2d |
|
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold?
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title. Context…
|
+19 | 23 | 40k | 14d |
|
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title and the context underneath, in the order the…
|
+9 | 13 | 1.6k | 1mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go wrong. Vial:…
|
2 | 1.8k | 1d | |
|
About the Prescriber conversations category
How to prepare for an appointment, what to bring, and how to ask for what you need without antagonising anyone. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
|
+6 | 11 | 9.5k | 9mo |
|
Request: export my own posts
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: export my own posts Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin export down and I want to set out where I have got…
|
2 | 57k | 6mo | |
|
Micro-titration: a disputed topic, argued properly
Micro-titration: a disputed topic, argued properly Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
|
+99 | 110 | 61k | 2d |
|
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind — one year on
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
|
+74 | 80 | 17k | 2d |