Access · Insurance & coverage · continued

[2026 update] Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy them posts 121–123

Access › Insurance & coverage insurance appeals prior authorisation

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

ma.balogunTL214 Jan 2025#121

Offering a way to settle Step therapy requirements rather than another opinion about it. Two measurements, taken the same way, a fortnight apart. If the difference is within the noise, the question was not answerable at this precision.

7 likes 18mo

DOdendaalTL3Regular15 Jan 2025#122

Tier placement and step therapy: some formularies place a medication on a higher tier or require you to fail cheaper alternatives before approving the one you want. Understanding the requirements before treatment starts matters.

17 likes 18mo

s.salgadoTL215 Jan 2025#123

n.cabrera, post #18: Where the Step therapy requirements reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for. Go to post

Appreciated. The plain phrasing does more work here than a longer post would.

0 likes in reply to #18 18mo

This topic was referenced in

Step therapy requirements and how to satisfy themAccess › Insurance & coverage · 25 replies
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long versionAccess › Insurance & coverage · 136 replies
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second datasetAccess › Insurance & coverage · 74 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure Access › Insurance & coverage appeals formulary prior authorisation insurance On the subject in the title: An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure Working notes rather than a conclusion. Appeal, and specifically the version of it that the documentation does not cover. The…	+12	16	15k	1d
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation insurance formulary appeals Posting this under the heading it deserves: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting a small dataset on Prior authorisation.…	+67	74	19k	21h
Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation formulary appeals insurance Solved On the subject in the title: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to know what people here actually do about prior authorisation, as…	+9	13	3.2k	17mo
Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on Access › Insurance & coverage appeals formulary insurance Peer-to-peer review: what actually happens on the call — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. The question about Peer-to-peer review that I actually want answered…	+2	6	41k	5mo
Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional Access › Insurance & coverage formulary insurance prior authorisation appeals Posting this under the heading it deserves: Appeal templates and why they are deliberately unemotional Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about appeal templates, deliberately narrow,…	+25	29	764	7mo

Related topics — sharing the tags insurance, appeals, prior authorisation

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Coming back to: Telehealth prescribing models in the US Regional › North America telehealth FDA compounding insurance Posting this under the heading it deserves: Telehealth prescribing models in the US Everything below is what sits behind that. Telehealth prescribing models — I have the observation and I do not trust my…	+26	30	17k	17h
Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on Regional › North America FDA compounding insurance Canadian access and provincial variation — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A follow-up question about Canadian access and provincial variation…	+43	47	964	12mo
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation appeals formulary insurance Solved Closed On the subject in the title: Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on Coverage. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and…	+46	50	41k	16mo
[2026 update] An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Access › Insurance & coverage prior authorisation insurance formulary Posting this under the heading it deserves: An appeal that failed, and what I would do differently Everything below is what sits behind that. Asking about appeal directly, because I have read four threads on…	+152	159	2.5k	13mo
Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first Clinical › Prescriber conversations telehealth prior authorisation beginner friendly type 2 diabetes Closed Second opinions: how to seek one without burning the first Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about second opinions that I actually want answered…	+1	5	33k	19mo