Worked example, since the arithmetic is the whole question. Five milligrams into one millilitre is 5 mg/mL. A 0.25 mg dose is 0.05 mL, which is five units on a U-100 syringe. Check that against your own numbers rather than taking mine.
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — what changed since
How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces: for a small peptide vial, the powder volume is negligible. For a larger vial or a kit with multiple compounds, the displacement can be a few tenths of a millilitre. If precision matters to you, account for it by targeting a final weight rather than a final volume.
I have changed my mind on this once already, so take it as current rather than settled.
Filter needles are worth considering if you are drawing from a glass ampoule and are pointless overhead for a stoppered vial. The trade is dead volume against particulate risk.
Correct me on the arithmetic if it is wrong; I would rather know.
Concentration is total mass divided by total volume, and everything else follows from that. Ten milligrams into two millilitres is five milligrams per millilitre, and it does not matter how the vial was labelled before you added anything.
It is the kind of thing that is obvious once and never again.
Worked example, since the arithmetic is the whole question. Five milligrams into one millilitre is 5 mg/mL. A 0.25 mg dose is 0.05 mL, which is five units on a U-100 syringe. Check that against your own numbers rather than taking mine.
Scoping that to what I have actually seen rather than what I have read.
On post #57 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
Genuinely open to being wrong about this one.
Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident: starting with "I want to draw 0.5 mL per dose" and working backward to the required concentration is more efficient than picking a diluent volume and hoping the math works out. State your target volume, then the required concentration follows.
I have separated what I observed from what I concluded, which does not always happen.
Second-hand on 5 mg vial, so weight it accordingly — someone whose method I trust told me this and I have not verified it myself.
Read the full topic (94 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reconstitution volumes that produce round numbers, tabulated
Reconstitution volumes that produce round numbers, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go…
|
+103 | 112 | 1.7k | 3mo |
|
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions Everything below is what sits behind that. Practical question with the units stated, because I have…
|
+106 | 142 | 9.5k | 19mo |
|
Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation
On the subject in the title: Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap, so I am…
|
+15 | 19 | 248 | 15mo |
|
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — the long version
On the subject in the title: A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. A narrow question about 5 mg vial, deliberately narrow, because…
|
+160 | 165 | 1.9k | 12mo |
|
How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go wrong. Vial:…
|
2 | 1.8k | 1d |
Related topics — sharing the tags dead volume, bacteriostatic water, reconstitution
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: The lowest dose that does anything: is that a real question?
The question in the title: The lowest dose that does anything: is that a real question? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have read the maintained page on this and I still…
|
+70 | 75 | 12k | 8mo |
|
Revisiting: Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case
Revisiting: Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the calculation with the inputs, so that somebody…
|
+109 | 122 | 5.8k | 17mo |
|
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Something changed and I would…
|
+94 | 99 | 29k | 2d |
|
Second pass at: Regression to the mean in progress reports
Second pass at: Regression to the mean in progress reports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Regression. It is mine, it is…
|
+71 | 75 | 4k | 17mo |
|
[2026 update] Clearance pathways and what renal impairment changes
On the subject in the title: Clearance pathways and what renal impairment changes Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Clearance pathways is wrong? I ask because I…
|
+63 | 69 | 50k | 13mo |