Sourcing · Independent verification · continued
Chain of custody for a sample you posted yourself — one year on posts 31–33
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
This follows post #30 rather than contradicting it.
Repeat testing: if you want to verify the same lot a second time, testing with a different service strengthens the conclusion. Testing with the same service verifies reproducibility but uses the same method.
That is all I can say without guessing.
2 likes 5d
h.ferrari, post #2: A supplier's own certificate is not independent. It can be posted, it is useful, and it is labelled for what it is. It is the kind of thing that is obvious once and never again. Go to post
A supplier's own certificate is not independent. It can be posted, it is useful, and it is labelled for what it is.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Submitting a sample: the process end to end
On the subject in the title: Submitting a sample: the process end to end Working notes rather than a conclusion. Submitting a sample keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because the answer is…
|
+99 | 114 | 29k | 21h |
|
Revisiting: Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats
Revisiting: Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Aggregate verification…
|
+22 | 26 | 23k | 17mo |
|
About the Independent verification category
Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate results, how to submit a sample, and how to read what comes back. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and…
|
+1 | 5 | 5.8k | 23h |
|
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats
On the subject in the title: Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin aggregate verification data down and…
|
+64 | 74 | 4.6k | 14h |
|
How Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate differ — a second dataset
How Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate differ — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on…
|
+42 | 46 | 46k | 2mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags VendorInvestigate, Janoshik Analytical, blind sampling
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparison of home results against: setting out…
|
+61 | 65 | 35k | 8mo |
|
Revisiting: Filing a first vendor report: a worked example
On the subject in the title: Revisiting: Filing a first vendor report: a worked example Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about Filing a first vendor that I think has a definite answer,…
|
2 | 60k | 11mo | |
|
Chain of custody for a sample you posted yourself
Chain of custody for a sample you posted yourself Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I was wrong about chain of custody in a thread last spring and I would like…
|
2 | 7.3k | 5h | |
|
Reporting a good result: why nobody bothers and why they should — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reporting a good result: why nobody bothers and why they should — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. The question about Reporting a good result…
|
+19 | 27 | 4.7k | 18mo |
|
Turnaround times and what they mean for a decision
Turnaround times and what they mean for a decision Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about turnaround times that I think has a definite answer,…
|
4 | 29k | 3mo |