Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions — the long version
Building on post #18 rather than restating it.
The best check on any reconstitution calculation is to do it twice by two different routes — mass per volume, then volume per dose — and see whether they agree. They should, and when they do not it is nearly always the concentration step.
I would rather say I do not know than round it up to an answer.
Fine by me. I had wanted a stronger conclusion and there is not one available.
Dead volume is the part nobody mentions until it costs them a dose. A fixed-needle insulin syringe holds very little; a detachable-needle luer configuration can hold enough to matter at small doses.
It is worth stating the boring hypothesis before the interesting one.
Do not shake. Swirl, or leave it. Vigorous agitation introduces air and shear, and neither helps a peptide go into solution any faster than patience does.
I would put this at better than even and not much better.
I read post #102 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Do not shake. Swirl, or leave it. Vigorous agitation introduces air and shear, and neither helps a peptide go into solution any faster than patience does.
The number is defensible. The precision I gave it is not.
Reconstituting a multi-strength kit: if a kit contains 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg vials and you are reconstituting all of them, writing the concentration on each vial in permanent marker as you go is the single most useful thing you can do to avoid dose errors later.
Adding the caveat now so it does not have to be extracted later.
Read the full topic (133 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Checking someone else's arithmetic: a worked example threadPractice › Reconstitution · 78 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Swirling versus inverting versus leaving — I have the observation and I do…
|
+20 | 24 | 16k | 26d |
|
Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident
On the subject in the title: Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working notes on choosing a concentration rather than a conclusion. I would…
|
2 | 719 | 1mo | |
|
Second pass at: Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident
Second pass at: Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Choosing a…
|
+49 | 54 | 6k | 4mo |
|
[2026 update] A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order Everything below is what sits behind that. Practical question with the units stated, because I…
|
+114 | 128 | 20k | 1mo |
|
Reconstitution volumes that produce round numbers, tabulated
Reconstitution volumes that produce round numbers, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go…
|
+103 | 112 | 1.7k | 3mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags reconstitution, worked example, syringe units
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Correlation in a self-tracked dataset: what it can support
Correlation in a self-tracked dataset: what it can support — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting a small dataset on correlation. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and the…
|
+152 | 166 | 48k | 23mo |
|
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of Titles…
|
+29 | 33 | 29k | 10mo |
|
Titles that describe the question, not the situation
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about titles, deliberately narrow, because the broad version has…
|
+137 | 153 | 22k | 8mo |
|
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
On the subject in the title: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about swirling versus inverting versus leaving on behalf of the question I keep…
|
2 | 18k | 18mo | |
|
Coming back to: Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker
The question in the title: Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Writing this out with the numbers in it, because…
|
+8 | 12 | 4.3k | 1d |