Practical note on decimal-point error: write down what you expect before you look. The number of times I have found what I went looking for is higher than chance would allow.
Follow-up: The decimal-point error, and the habit that catches it posts 121–132
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Where I part company with post #121, and it is a narrow parting.
Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
The answer changed when I changed how I was measuring, which was informative.
Post #121 is the version of this I will quote in future. One addition.
Decimal-point error is one of those subjects where the general answer and the answer for a specific case diverge, and the thread will go in circles until someone says which one is being asked for.
Answering the question post #121 raises rather than the one it answers.
For anyone finding this later: the short answer on decimal-point error is that it depends on one thing, and the rest of the thread is people identifying which thing.
Understood, and I withdraw the assumption I opened with.
Building on post #125 rather than restating it.
Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
Before the thread moves on from decimal-point error — what is the sample size behind the claim? I am not being difficult; I have seen the same figure quoted from an n of four and from an n of four hundred.
This follows post #129 rather than contradicting it.
Do not shake. Swirl, or leave it. Vigorous agitation introduces air and shear, and neither helps a peptide go into solution any faster than patience does.
That has held every time I have looked, which is not the same as always.
One more thing on decimal-point error that took me far too long to see: the two figures people quote are not measuring the same quantity. Once you notice that, the apparent contradiction disappears.
What I can speak to on decimal-point error is narrow, so I will keep it narrow rather than generalising from it. Beyond that boundary I do not know.
This topic was referenced in
- Coming back to: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alonePractice › Reconstitution · 24 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How much of the diluent volume the powder itself displaces Writing this out with the numbers in it, because "roughly" is how these go wrong. Vial:…
|
2 | 1.8k | 1d | |
|
Coming back to: Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker
The question in the title: Why I now write the concentration on the vial in marker I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Writing this out with the numbers in it, because…
|
+8 | 12 | 4.3k | 1d |
|
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions — the long version
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Practical question with the units stated,…
|
+110 | 132 | 1.7k | 3mo |
|
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
On the subject in the title: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about swirling versus inverting versus leaving on behalf of the question I keep…
|
2 | 18k | 18mo | |
|
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — the long version
On the subject in the title: A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. A narrow question about 5 mg vial, deliberately narrow, because…
|
+160 | 165 | 1.9k | 12mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags concentration maths, bacteriostatic water, dead volume
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order
A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Practical question with the units stated, because I have seen how…
|
+12 | 16 | 40k | 15mo |
|
Coming back to: Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation
Over-dilution: when your dose falls below one readable graduation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a…
|
+90 | 97 | 1.1k | 7mo |
|
About the Pens & autoinjectors category
Pen mechanics, dose counters, priming, and what happens when a pen is used off its label. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
+1 | 5 | 92 | 5mo |
|
Coming back to: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Swirling versus inverting versus leaving — I have the observation and I do…
|
+20 | 24 | 16k | 26d |
|
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions Everything below is what sits behind that. Practical question with the units stated, because I have…
|
+106 | 142 | 9.5k | 19mo |