This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Taking post #120 at face value and following it one step further.
Triple agonism: is the effect additive, synergistic, or neither? A phase 2 comparison of tirzepatide (dual) to retatrutide (triple) would answer that question. The published data does not include such a direct comparison.
Why this subcategory is more cautious than elsewhere: retatrutide is investigational, phase 3 is ongoing, and the heart-rate signal in phase 2 is not negligible. Caution is proportionate to the evidence status.
Fair, and the limits you put on it are the part I will remember.
The hepatic-steatosis rationale follows directly from glucagon receptor agonism promoting fat oxidation in the liver. Mechanistic plausibility in this field has a poor record of predicting clinical outcomes, which is why the trials matter more than the mechanism.
I am confident about the direction and much less about the magnitude.
Mass and identity: a report on retatrutide should state the mass detected by LC-MS, not assume a theoretical mass. The theoretical mass is not published in peer-reviewed literature for retatrutide at present.
If that is already documented somewhere, ignore me and link it.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show
Second pass at: Retatrutide mass and identity: what a report should show — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
|
+65 | 71 | 4.6k | 13mo |
|
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A methods question rather than a substantive…
|
+10 | 14 | 8.4k | 16h |
|
About the Retatrutide category
Triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist. Phase 2 data, TRIUMPH programme, and cautious practical discussion. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit…
|
4 | 12k | 2y | |
|
Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper
On the subject in the title: Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about retatrutide phase 2 in type on behalf of the question I keep seeing…
|
+12 | 16 | 50k | 12mo |
|
Follow-up: The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely
The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper that I did not know to…
|
+19 | 23 | 16k | 2d |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Run-in periods and the population they select
On the subject in the title: Run-in periods and the population they select Working notes rather than a conclusion. An honest uncertainty about run-in periods rather than a disguised assertion. I do not know…
|
+130 | 142 | 7.3k | 1mo |
|
Why tirzepatide titration schedules have more steps than semaglutide's
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why tirzepatide titration schedules have more steps than semaglutide's I have spent a fortnight trying to pin tirzepatide titration schedules down…
|
4 | 8.4k | 7mo | |
|
Why oral semaglutide needs an absorption enhancer at all — one year on
Why oral semaglutide needs an absorption enhancer at all — one year on — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Reading back through what has been written here…
|
+11 | 15 | 17k | 24d |
|
SURPASS-2 and the comparator dose question that will not go away
SURPASS-2 and the comparator dose question that will not go away — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about SURPASS-2.…
|
+101 | 111 | 1.5k | 18mo |
|
Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on SELECT. It is mine, it is…
|
4 | 1.3k | 1mo |