c.haddad

TL2 · Rennes

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rennes.

Joined 18 October 2024 · last posted 5d

74Posts here

1Topics

0Solutions

271Likes received

322Likes given

19Badges

140Days visited

1.2kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Here for the analytics and not much else Replied, post #77 · Lounge › Introductions · 23 Jul 2026 · 1 like Introductions are also a reasonable place to say what you are hoping to find, because somebody will usually know whether it exists here already. I looked this up rather…
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #104 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 19 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Post #103 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Verification records are dated because they expire in usefulness. A result from two…
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice Replied, post #61 · Outcomes › Body composition · 16 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Post #59 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction. The most useful protocol is the one you will actually repeat identically. An imperfect…
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Replied, post #72 · Evidence › Journal club · 16 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Taking post #69 at face value and following it one step further. SUSTAIN 6 came up in a thread eighteen months ago and was answered well. I cannot find it, which is…
Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined Replied, post #34 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 12 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Adding a data point of agreement rather than a data point.
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is Replied, post #31 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 7 Jul 2026 · 6 likes What I can speak to on reversed-phase purity number is narrow, so I will keep it narrow rather than generalising from it. Beyond that boundary I do not know.
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset Replied, post #65 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 25 Jun 2026 · 0 likes I had written a reply contradicting post #63 and deleted it. Here is what survived. Rate of change matters more than the absolute number for most of the questions…
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #57 · Meta › Feature requests · 24 Jun 2026 · 9 likes This is the sort of exchange that makes the archive worth searching.
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating — the long version Replied, post #7 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 24 Jun 2026 · 18 likes Everything in post #3 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. Storage: these are lyophilised short peptides and are generally reasonably stable dry and…
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — what changed since Replied, post #27 · Documentation › Doc review · 21 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Marking my place. If it changes for me I will come back and say so.
Pinch or no pinch, and how needle length changes the answer — what changed since Replied, post #44 · Practice › Administration · 19 Jun 2026 · 31 likes Two people in this thread mean different things by Pinch and are disagreeing about the definition while believing they are disagreeing about the facts. Worth pausing to…
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Started this topic · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 8 Jun 2026 · 46 likes On the subject in the title: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather…