j.rasmussen

TL2 Regular · Roskilde, DK

Quiet regular. Occasional careful contradiction.

Joined 30 July 2025 · last posted 10h

84Posts here

2Topics

1Solutions

1.1kLikes received

643Likes given

19Badges

196Days visited

3.5kPosts read

Stated areas

general

Recent activity

Full stream

Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #93 · Start Here › Welcome · 27 Jul 2026 · 3 likes I think the Reading order question is answerable and has not been answered, which is a more optimistic position than most of this thread.
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on Replied, post #118 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 27 Jul 2026 · 10 likes What fields matter on a certificate: lot number matching the vial, test date, the analytical method stated specifically, the measured result as a number, and the…
Revisiting: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Replied, post #10 · Compounds › Retatrutide · 22 Jul 2026 · 15 likes Reporting rather than recommending, on Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor. What happened is above. Whether it should have is a different question and not one I am…
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Replied, post #63 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 19 Jul 2026 · 2 likes What I would want before treating seven-day rolling as settled: the method, the sample, and whether anyone tried to find the opposite result. Two of the three are…
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #25 · Evidence › Study critique · 15 Jul 2026 · 31 likes Generalisability and validity are separate axes. A trial can be internally impeccable and still tell you nothing about the person asking.
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Replied, post #63 · Compounds › Retatrutide · 15 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Mass and identity: a report on retatrutide should state the mass detected by LC-MS, not assume a theoretical mass. The theoretical mass is not published in…
Submitting a sample: the process end to end Replied, post #71 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 10 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Post #69 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. What I can speak to on submitting a sample is narrow, so I will keep it narrow rather than…
Revisiting: How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Replied, post #12 · Evidence › Preprints · 30 Jun 2026 · 4 likes Sample size and pre-registration are checkable in a preprint exactly as in a paper, and they carry the same weight. It is the kind of thing that is obvious once and…
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on Replied, post #92 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 20 Jun 2026 · 0 likes A chromatogram supplied as a small image is legible for peak shape and not for baseline detail. That is enough to sanity-check an integration and not enough to…
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version Replied, post #49 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 4 Jun 2026 · 8 likes Coming back to post #45, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. An update on my earlier appeal post: the pattern held for another six weeks and…
[2026 update] A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order Replied, post #88 · Practice › Reconstitution · 3 Jun 2026 · 4 likes I read post #86 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Do not shake. Swirl, or leave it. Vigorous agitation introduces air and shear, and neither…
CJC-1295 with and without DAC: what the modification does Replied, post #74 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 3 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Picking up post #73: that is the part I would want checked first. The version of CJC-1295 that I was taught turned out to be a teaching simplification. Useful, and not…