o.lindgren
TL2 Regular · Uppsala, SE
Compares vendor documentation across suppliers for the directory pages. Mostly a spreadsheet person.
Joined 23 October 2024 · last posted 5d · groups: wiki-editors
77Posts here
3Topics
1Solutions
868Likes received
597Likes given
25Badges
184Days visited
3.7kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #66 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 23 Jul 2026 · 2 likes Verification records are dated because they expire in usefulness. A result from two years ago describes a lot from two years ago. That is the practical version. The…
-
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version Replied, post #100 · Analytics › Impurities & related substances · 21 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Comparing impurity profiles across suppliers is much more informative than comparing purity figures, and almost nobody has the documents to do it. I have separated what…
-
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #107 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 20 Jul 2026 · 7 likes A supplier that supplies a supplementary certificate for a lot released a year ago has demonstrated that its records exist and are retrievable. That is a real property.
-
Substitution between formats during a shortage — what changed since Replied, post #20 · Access › Shortages · 18 Jul 2026 · 31 likes That matches what I have seen, for whatever a single anecdote is worth.
-
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #110 · Meta › Feature requests · 17 Jul 2026 · 30 likes Tradeoffs: every feature has a cost in maintenance and complexity. Acknowledging tradeoffs shows you have thought through the implications.
-
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Replied, post #75 · Evidence › Journal club · 17 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Post #73 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. Where the SUSTAIN 6 discussion usually stalls is that nobody wants to say "I do not know" and…
-
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #115 · Evidence › Journal club · 12 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Reading order that works for these sessions: registry entry, methods, baseline table, primary result, then abstract last. Reading the abstract first anchors everything…
-
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #28 · Practice › Interactions · 10 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Metformin: commonly co-administered and relevant to gastrointestinal tolerability. Gastrointestinal side effects can overlap and additive. Taking them separately or…
-
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since Replied, post #49 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 9 Jul 2026 · 27 likes Concentration and dose get conflated constantly in this subcategory. Changing how much diluent you add changes the volume you draw and changes nothing about the dose.
-
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with… Replied, post #82 · Analytics › Method validation · 8 Jul 2026 · 1 like System suitability: injections run at the start of a batch to establish that the instrument and column are performing. Acceptance criteria typically include replicate…
-
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #26 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 3 Jul 2026 · 2 likes Nothing in a verification record is a guarantee about the vial in your hand. That check is yours and nobody can do it for you. I would be interested in a counterexample…
-
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Replied, post #72 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 28 Jun 2026 · 4 likes Ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nanometres estimates concentration for peptides containing aromatic residues and gives nothing for peptides that do not. Knowing which…