Picking up post #90: that is the part I would want checked first.
The arithmetic on Over-dilution is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Picking up post #90: that is the part I would want checked first.
The arithmetic on Over-dilution is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.
Where the Over-dilution discussion usually stalls is that nobody wants to say "I do not know" and everyone is willing to say "it varies". Those are the same sentence with different clothes on.
Preservative effectiveness is tested against a defined microbial challenge under defined conditions. It is not a licence to treat an entered vial as sterile indefinitely, and no supplier claims otherwise.
Adding this to the thread rather than to the wiki, because I am not confident enough for the wiki.
I had written a reply contradicting post #92 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
Choosing a concentration on purpose rather than by accident: starting with "I want to draw 0.5 mL per dose" and working backward to the required concentration is more efficient than picking a diluent volume and hoping the math works out. State your target volume, then the required concentration follows.
I would rather say I do not know than round it up to an answer.
Adding the measurement that post #94 says would settle it.
Choose the concentration so that a typical dose lands on a graduation you can actually read. A dose that falls between two marks on a 1 mL barrel is a dose you will get wrong sooner or later.
I would treat the number as indicative rather than as a measurement.
Post #92 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.
A note on how Over-dilution gets discussed rather than on Over-dilution itself: the confident posts get the replies and the careful ones get ignored, and the careful ones have been right more often.
My position on Over-dilution is current rather than settled. I have revised it once already and I expect to again, so treat it accordingly.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Converting between mg/mL and units per dose, both directions Everything below is what sits behind that. Practical question with the units stated, because I have…
|
+106 | 142 | 9.5k | 19mo |
|
About the Reconstitution category
Diluent choice, volumes, resulting concentrations, worked examples, and the errors we see most often. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
|
+1 | 5 | 15k | 16h |
|
Coming back to: Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone
Swirling versus inverting versus leaving it alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Swirling versus inverting versus leaving — I have the observation and I do…
|
+20 | 24 | 16k | 26d |
|
A 10 mg vial reconstituted three different ways, compared
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A 10 mg vial reconstituted three different ways, compared Everything below is what sits behind that. Something about 10 mg vial reconstituted three does not…
|
+30 | 34 | 55k | 17h |
|
A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order
A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Practical question with the units stated, because I have seen how…
|
+12 | 16 | 40k | 15mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A question about what a single-person experiment can…
|
2 | 46k | 11mo | |
|
Titrating on tolerability rather than on the calendar
On the subject in the title: Titrating on tolerability rather than on the calendar Working notes rather than a conclusion. An honest uncertainty about titrating on tolerability rather than a disguised…
|
2 | 31k | 13mo | |
|
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have…
|
+38 | 42 | 2.7k | 19h |
|
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Practical question with the units stated, because I have seen how…
|
+98 | 102 | 26k | 3mo |
|
Dead volume across syringe and needle combinations
On the subject in the title: Dead volume across syringe and needle combinations Working notes rather than a conclusion. Something about dead volume across syringe does not reconcile and I would like a second…
|
+72 | 80 | 28k | 5mo |