d.bakker, post #4: Filing a mild objection to the consensus on orforglipron. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Go to post
I had written a reply contradicting post #30 and deleted it. Here is what survived.
What I want from this orforglipron thread is the list of things that would need to be true for the claim to hold. If we can write that list, we can check it.