Retatrutide dose escalation in the published trials posts 151–160
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Where the retatrutide dose escalation reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
What we do not know about retatrutide, listed explicitly: long-term safety, real-world response rates, the dose response in diverse populations, whether the heart-rate signal persists or attenuates, durability of effect on withdrawal, efficacy in comorbidities beyond obesity.
Good question, well framed, and I would like to see it answered properly.
Mass and identity: a report on retatrutide should state the mass detected by LC-MS, not assume a theoretical mass. The theoretical mass is not published in peer-reviewed literature for retatrutide at present.
Posted with less confidence than the sentence structure implies.
Post #156 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Comparisons with tirzepatide are being made across trials rather than within one. Different populations, different durations, different endpoints; the effect sizes are not commensurable and nobody has run the head-to-head.
Adding the caveat now so it does not have to be extracted later.
No phase 3 results exist for retatrutide. Anything attributed to a completed phase 3 trial of this compound is either a misreading or an invention, and the honest answer to most questions here is that the data is not in yet.
This topic was referenced in
- Triple agonism: additive, synergistic, or neither?Compounds › Retatrutide · 80 replies
- Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worryCompounds › Retatrutide · 56 replies
- Follow-up: Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paperCompounds › Retatrutide · 5 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely
The retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper, read closely — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A follow-up question about retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper that I did not know to…
|
+19 | 23 | 16k | 2d |
|
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it
What TRIUMPH is designed to answer, and why we should not pre-empt it I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. TRIUMPH keeps being re-asked here and I think…
|
+4 | 8 | 142 | 6h |
|
Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction
The question in the title: Why a glucagon receptor agonist in a weight-loss compound is not a contradiction I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to disagree…
|
+43 | 47 | 19k | 2d |
|
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
|
+92 | 97 | 3.6k | 20h |
|
Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Hepatic effects of glucagon receptor agonism: the mechanistic worry Everything below is what sits behind that. Something about hepatic effects of glucagon receptor…
|
+51 | 56 | 700 | 22mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags preprint, retatrutide, effect size
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet
On the subject in the title: The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet Working notes rather than a conclusion. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a question about a compound…
|
2 | 49k | 2y | |
|
[2026 update] Does dual agonism explain the effect size, or is it dose?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Does dual agonism explain the effect size, or is it dose? A question about dual agonism that I think has a definite answer, unlike most of what I…
|
+58 | 63 | 40k | 9mo |
|
Sample size intuition for a personal experiment
On the subject in the title: Sample size intuition for a personal experiment Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about sample size intuition that I did not know to ask the first time.…
|
4 | 62k | 18mo | |
|
Coming back to: Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists Everything below is what sits behind that. Nausea profile of amylin analogues — I have the…
|
+48 | 53 | 31k | 13mo |
|
Coming back to: An 18-month record including the parts that went badly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: An 18-month record including the parts that went badly Everything below is what sits behind that. Asking about 18-month record on behalf of the question I keep…
|
+83 | 89 | 52k | 12mo |