The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Research Methods · N-of-1 designs · continued

Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic posts 91–97

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

BV
bias_varianceTL4Biostatistician8 Dec 2024#91

Confirming post #88 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.

I would keep washout and the decision it usually gets used for separate in this thread. They are related and they are not the same question, and merging them is why the last one went badly.

1 like 20mo
JI
j.iyerTL29 Dec 2024#92

I had written a reply contradicting post #90 and deleted it. Here is what survived.

It does not tell you about anybody else, which is why aggregating these accounts does not produce evidence of the kind people want it to.

7 likes 20mo
BD
baseline_driftTL2Analytical chemist9 Dec 2024#93

On washout the community has more anecdote than the confidence in this thread implies, and I include my own contribution in that.

17 likes 20mo
IA
id.almeidaTL29 Dec 2024#94
MJayawardena, post #75: Adding the measurement that post #74 says would settle it. The question underneath washout is usually "how would I tell?" rather than "what is true?", and that one has a method attached to it. Write down what you would expect to see under each hypothesis before you collect anything. If they predict the same observation, collecting it… Go to post

The practical version of washout is three sentences long. The rigorous version is three pages and reaches the same conclusion with the conditions attached.

0 likes in reply to #75 20mo
DO
d.oyelaranTL3Pharmacist9 Dec 2024#95
b.aalto, post #13: A photograph or a device reading is a harder record than a recollection, and where one is available it should be the record. Go to post

Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.

0 likes in reply to #13 20mo
NK
n.krastevTL29 Dec 2024#96

Multiple outcomes measured without a primary one means something will move. Nominate the primary in advance and report the rest as secondary.

The number is defensible. The precision I gave it is not.

4 likes 20mo
K
KLindqvistTL4 Moderator9 Dec 2024#97

Posting my washout numbers with the method attached so they can be discounted properly. Uncontrolled, unblinded, and collected by someone who wanted a particular answer.

12 likes 20mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. An honest uncertainty about ABAB design rather than a disguised…
SSDSEF 2 45k 5mo
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about pre-registering a personal experiment, deliberately narrow,…
PADAVSSJL+96 119 58k 14mo
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Blinding yourself,…
CTSDNGJEMD+7 11 1.8k 22h
Coming back to: Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
The question in the title: Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A question about what a single-person experiment…
MHAPNTKNK+56 62 11k 4mo
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A question about what a single-person experiment can…
SBSKGF 2 46k 11mo

Related topics — sharing the tags effect size, data table, worked example

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…
VMDMMGRPT+41 46 3.7k 22h
Washout: how long is long enough, and for what purpose
Washout: how long is long enough, and for what purpose — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about washout, deliberately narrow, because the broad version has…
BBNKPABRE+63 70 13k 10mo
Revisiting: Semaglutide formulation: what is in the licensed product besides the peptide
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Semaglutide formulation: what is in the licensed product besides the peptide Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying…
UCZACNSKGF+72 77 7.2k 19mo
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of trifluoroacetate content is wrong? I ask because I…
AIRDRVHFAV+123 134 31k 5mo
The decimal-point error, and the habit that catches it
The decimal-point error, and the habit that catches it Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. An honest uncertainty about decimal-point error rather than a…
JDSDNGNSMP+110 121 10k 7mo