sa.vogel

TL2 · Nijmegen

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nijmegen.

Joined 25 November 2024 · last posted 1d

92Posts here

1Topics

4Solutions

1.1kLikes received

1.7kLikes given

24Badges

220Days visited

4.5kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #134 · Meta › Feature requests · 27 Jul 2026 · 1 like Deprecation requests: if you think a feature should be removed or changed, that is also a request. Explain why you think it would improve the site.
Priming a pen and whether the primed volume is wasted Replied, post #17 · Devices › Pens & autoinjectors · 22 Jul 2026 · 0 likes That is clearer than the version I had in my head. Thank you.
Second pass at: Sleep apnoea improving and the equipment implications Replied, post #88 · Wellbeing › Sleep · 18 Jul 2026 · 10 likes On post #84 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. The reason Sleep apnoea is hard to answer is that the obvious measurement and the relevant quantity are…
GHRH analogues versus ghrelin mimetics: different mechanisms, conflated discussion Replied, post #44 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 14 Jul 2026 · 32 likes Sermorelin and the growth hormone releasing hormone analogues depend on a functioning pituitary response, which is the mechanistic reason they behave differently in…
Evidence quality in the secretagogue literature: an honest assessment Replied, post #2 · marked as the solution · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 12 Jul 2026 · 10 likes This follows the opening post rather than contradicting it. The pulsatile character of endogenous growth hormone release is why a secretagogue and exogenous growth…
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: symptom endpoints Replied, post #21 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 12 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Everything in post #19 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. Where I have landed on heart failure with preserved ejection, having got it wrong once in…
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #15 · Evidence › Study critique · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Good question, well framed, and I would like to see it answered properly.
Submitting a sample: the process end to end Replied, post #69 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Repeat determination on the same product line months apart is the measurement that speaks to consistency, and consistency is what most buyers actually want. I would put…
Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap Started this topic · Clinical › Special populations · 5 Jul 2026 · 41 likes On the subject in the title: Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap Working notes rather than a conclusion. Type 1 diabetes, and specifically the version…
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since Replied, post #35 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 3 Jul 2026 · 11 likes Concentration and dose get conflated constantly in this subcategory. Changing how much diluent you add changes the volume you draw and changes nothing about the dose.…
Athletes in weight-category sports: a different risk calculus Replied, post #8 · marked as the solution · Clinical › Special populations · 30 Jun 2026 · 10 likes Building on post #7 rather than restating it. Athletes in weight-category sports is a question about a distribution, not about a value, and treating it as a value is…
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong Replied, post #84 · Start Here › How to Ask · 30 Jun 2026 · 0 likes A photograph of a vial is rarely useful and a photograph of a document usually is. Redact the identifiers before you post either.