Answering the question the opening post raises rather than the one it answers. Adolescent evidence exists for some compounds in this class and is a separate approval decision with its own trials rather than an extension of the adult data.
On the subject in the title: Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap Working notes rather than a conclusion.
Type 1 diabetes, and specifically the version of it that the documentation does not cover. The maintained page handles the general case well and stops exactly where my question starts.
Setting out the gap in case it is a gap in the page rather than a gap in what is known.
Answering the question the opening post raises rather than the one it answers.
Adolescent evidence exists for some compounds in this class and is a separate approval decision with its own trials rather than an extension of the adult data.
Genetic and ancestry-related differences in response are asked about regularly and the published evidence is thin enough that the honest answer is short.
That is the practical version. The rigorous version is longer and says the same thing.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Older adults, sarcopenia risk, and the trade-off nobody quantifies
Older adults, sarcopenia risk, and the trade-off nobody quantifies — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Older adults: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I have had to…
|
+103 | 109 | 12k | 5mo |
|
Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap — what changed since
Type 1 diabetes: off-label use and the evidence gap — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of Type 1 diabetes is wrong?…
|
+68 | 77 | 31k | 20mo |
|
Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose
On the subject in the title: Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose Working notes rather than a conclusion. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about renal impairment. Everyone…
|
4 | 8.9k | 19mo | |
|
[2026 update] People with a low starting BMI: where the evidence stops
People with a low starting BMI: where the evidence stops Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published…
|
+19 | 23 | 62k | 23mo |
|
Coming back to: Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose
Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Renal impairment — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of it,…
|
+30 | 34 | 48k | 18mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mood changes: monitoring, and when to involve a professional
Mood changes: monitoring, and when to involve a professional — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Mood changes — I have the observation and I do not trust my interpretation of…
|
2 | 362 | 13mo | |
|
Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow Everything below is what sits behind that. A follow-up question about food noise that I did not know to…
|
+40 | 45 | 8.9k | 20mo |
|
Absolute versus relative contraindications
On the subject in the title: Absolute versus relative contraindications Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that absolute versus relative contraindications deserves a maintained page rather than…
|
+4 | 8 | 23k | 8mo |
|
About the Contraindications category
Absolute and relative contraindications, and the conditions that change the calculus. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
+6 | 10 | 35k | 14mo |
|
Talking to a therapist about this specifically — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Talking to a therapist about this specifically — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A question about the part of this that…
|
+59 | 65 | 13k | 14mo |