The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Clinical · Bloodwork · continued

[2026 update] Thyroid function tests during substantial weight change posts 31–60

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

IB
i.bakkenTL25 Apr 2026#31

Nobody has said the unglamorous part of Thyroid function tests during substantial yet, so: most of the variation is explained by things that are boring to write about and easy to check.

5 likes 4mo
DO
dr_okonkwoTL46 Apr 2026#32
KS
k.salinasTL27 Apr 2026 · edited#33

The arithmetic in post #31 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.

Liver enzyme changes during rapid weight loss are commonly reported and have several possible explanations, which is exactly why they need clinical interpretation rather than forum interpretation.

Not disagreeing with anyone above, just adding the bit I keep having to look up.

29 likes 4mo
DF
d.fontaineTL28 Apr 2026#34

Answering the Thyroid function tests during substantial question as asked, then the question I think is meant. As asked: yes, with the qualification below. As meant: it depends on how the first measurement was taken.

0 likes 4mo
CC
c.correiaTL29 Apr 2026#35

Taking post #33 at face value and following it one step further.

The question underneath Thyroid function tests during substantial is usually "how would I tell?" rather than "what is true?", and that one has a method attached to it.

Write down what you would expect to see under each hypothesis before you collect anything. If they predict the same observation, collecting it will not help.

2 likes 4mo
ME
me.eriksenTL211 Apr 2026#36
m.lehtinen, post #9: Add biological variation and analytical imprecision to that base rate and the probability of a meaningless flag on a multi-analyte panel is substantial. Go to post

Post #34 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.

Fasting state: some lab tests require fasting; others do not. Lipids on a fasting draw differ from lipids on a fed draw. Always note whether the test was fasting when comparing results.

It is worth checking rather than assuming, which costs nothing.

9 likes in reply to #9 4mo
PS
p.silvaTL212 Apr 2026#37

Worth separating Thyroid function tests during substantial as a question about the compound from Thyroid function tests during substantial as a question about the documentation. They get answered by different people and only one of them is answerable here.

21 likes 4mo
AA
a.almeidaTL213 Apr 2026#38

I had read the opposite somewhere and cannot now find where, which tells me something.

0 likes 3mo
CV
c.vasquezTL214 Apr 2026#39
figure_review, post #28: The arithmetic in post #25 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Two claims get bundled together under Thyroid function tests during substantial and they need separating. The descriptive one — this is what was observed — is usually well supported. The causal one — this is why — usually is not. Almost every… Go to post

This follows post #36 rather than contradicting it.

TSH and free hormones: TSH is a reasonable screening test but does not tell you about actual free hormone levels. If TSH is abnormal, free thyroid hormones confirm whether there is a real thyroid problem.

1 like in reply to #28 3mo
CL
customs_ledgerTL3Regular15 Apr 2026 · edited#40
p.silva, post #37: Worth separating Thyroid function tests during substantial as a question about the compound from Thyroid function tests during substantial as a question about the documentation. They get answered by different people and only one of them is answerable here. Go to post

Add biological variation and analytical imprecision to that base rate and the probability of a meaningless flag on a multi-analyte panel is substantial.

6 likes in reply to #37 3mo
ZO
z.onwukaTL216 Apr 2026#41

Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.

16 likes 3mo
MR
m.rasmussenTL217 Apr 2026#42

Narrowing post #39, because the general version has more than one answer.

Renal function markers: eGFR is estimated, not measured. It depends on creatinine, age, and weight. A small change in creatinine might not mean a real change in kidney function.

6 likes 3mo
JB
j.baptistaTL219 Apr 2026#43

Rate of change is frequently more informative than absolute value, and it is only available if the earlier results were kept.

The confident version of this sentence would be wrong, so here is the hedged one.

0 likes 3mo
CD
c.dahlbergTL220 Apr 2026#44
IC
i.coelhoTL221 Apr 2026#45
m.rasmussen, post #42: Narrowing post #39, because the general version has more than one answer. Renal function markers: eGFR is estimated, not measured. It depends on creatinine, age, and weight. A small change in creatinine might not mean a real change in kidney function. Go to post

Biological variation: the person-to-person variation in a biomarker for a healthy person is larger than most people realize. Comparing your result to the reference interval is one thing; comparing your result today to your result from months ago is more sensitive to change.

That is the version I use. It may not be the version that is correct.

11 likes in reply to #42 3mo
DP
d.petrescuTL222 Apr 2026 · edited#46

Reference intervals: constructed to contain the central 95% of a reference population, which means one in twenty healthy people falls outside one by definition. Add biological variation and analytical imprecision and the base rate of a meaningless flag is substantial.

That holds for the case as described. Change the assumptions and it may not.

3 likes 3mo
TA
t.abubakarTL223 Apr 2026#47

Where I part company with post #43, and it is a narrow parting.

The failure mode on Thyroid function tests during substantial is boring rather than dramatic. It is almost always the step everyone assumes was done correctly because it is too simple to get wrong.

0 likes 3mo
P
PSkarbekTL3Regular24 Apr 2026#48

Adding a reference point for Thyroid function tests during substantial. Mine is a single case, collected without controls, and I am posting the method alongside it so it can be discounted appropriately.

24 likes 3mo
BR
b.restrepoTL225 Apr 2026#49

Lipid changes during substantial weight loss are expected and their trajectory is not always monotonic. A single mid-course panel can be misleading.

31 likes 3mo
BM
buffer_marginTL3Regular26 Apr 2026#50

Practical answer on Thyroid function tests during substantial, since the theoretical one is upthread: do the simplest check first, write down the result, and only then decide whether the complicated explanation is needed. It usually is not.

16 likes 3mo
KA
k.adeyemiTL227 Apr 2026#51

Post #50 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Renal function markers: eGFR is estimated, not measured. It depends on creatinine, age, and weight. A small change in creatinine might not mean a real change in kidney function.

25 likes 3mo
OA
o.abrahamsenTL3Regular28 Apr 2026#52

TSH and free hormones: TSH is a reasonable screening test but does not tell you about actual free hormone levels. If TSH is abnormal, free thyroid hormones confirm whether there is a real thyroid problem.

The variance between people here is larger than the effect being discussed.

0 likes 3mo
RN
r.novakTL230 Apr 2026#53

Reading this Thyroid function tests during substantial thread as someone who came in with a fixed view: the third and seventh replies moved me and the confident ones did not.

4 likes 3mo
L
LJankowiakTL3Regular1 May 2026#54
n.vukovic, post #11: Nothing to add on the substance. Thank you for taking the question at face value. Go to post

On post #52 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

On Thyroid function tests during substantial, I would rather understate and be corrected upward than overstate and be quoted. That is a house style here and it is a good one.

12 likes in reply to #11 3mo
BW
br.wikstromTL22 May 2026#55

Confirming post #54 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person.

Glycaemic markers integrate over different periods. A point glucose and a longer-term marker disagreeing is not a contradiction; it is two different questions.

33 likes 3mo
CE
crossover_entryTL3Regular3 May 2026#56

I had written a reply contradicting post #52 and deleted it. Here is what survived.

Liver enzyme changes during rapid weight loss are commonly reported and have several possible explanations, which is exactly why they need clinical interpretation rather than forum interpretation.

0 likes 3mo
AW
ai.wikstromTL24 May 2026#57
buffer_margin, post #50: Practical answer on Thyroid function tests during substantial, since the theoretical one is upthread: do the simplest check first, write down the result, and only then decide whether the complicated explanation is needed. It usually is not. Go to post

Add biological variation and analytical imprecision to that base rate and the probability of a meaningless flag on a multi-analyte panel is substantial.

Written in the hope of being told what I have missed.

7 likes in reply to #50 3mo
TS
t.steenkampTL2Member5 May 2026#58
d.yilmaz, post #6: Post #5 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. I disagree with the framing of Thyroid function tests during substantial above, and I think it is a substantive disagreement rather than a terminological one. Setting out why, so it can be checked. The reasoning depends on an assumption that is doing a lot… Go to post

Time of day: some biomarkers vary across the day. Cortisol in the morning differs from cortisol in the evening. Comparing results from different times of day is comparing things that are not the same.

I am reporting what happened, not recommending it.

17 likes in reply to #6 3mo
NR
n.ramosTL26 May 2026#59
a.krastev, post #19: Post #18 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. A trend needs at least three points to be a trend. Two points are a line and a line through noise is still a line. I would want the raw data before agreeing with my own summary of it. Go to post

A trend needs at least three points to be a trend. Two points are a line and a line through noise is still a line.

Worth saying I have only my own numbers here, and n is small.

12 likes in reply to #19 3mo
MD
methods_draftTL2Member7 May 2026 · edited#60

The reason Thyroid function tests during substantial is hard to answer is that the obvious measurement and the relevant quantity are not the same thing, and substituting one for the other is silent.

26 likes 3mo