Evidence · Study critique · continued
Criticising the method without criticising the authors posts 61–62
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Adding the measurement that post #61 says would settle it.
Worth stating the null on criticising the method without criticising before we explain it: the observation may be nothing. That possibility deserves a sentence and usually does not get one.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Study critique category
Structured criticism of a specific published study. Criticise the method, not the author. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
4 | 114 | 16mo | |
|
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A well-designed study with a badly written abstract Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about well-designed…
|
+117 | 128 | 7.2k | 14mo |
|
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on structured critique template. It is mine,…
|
+47 | 51 | 16k | 15h |
|
Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on
On the subject in the title: Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about Criticising…
|
+16 | 20 | 61k | 11mo |
|
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author Everything below is what sits behind that. Critique, and specifically the version of it that the…
|
+34 | 38 | 20k | 17h |
Related topics — sharing the tags disputed, observational data, confounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Aggregated purity results across four, from the point of…
|
3 | 24k | 9mo | |
|
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working notes on selection rather than a conclusion. I would rather post the…
|
2 | 55k | 7mo | |
|
Journal club: STEP 3 and the intensive behavioural therapy floor
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 3 and the intensive behavioural therapy floor Everything below is what sits behind that. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers…
|
+6 | 10 | 13k | 28d |
|
What I would record differently if I started again
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would record differently if I started again Asking about the phase almost nobody writes about. The material here on losing is good. The…
|
2 | 12k | 5mo | |
|
Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea: reading SURMOUNT-OSA
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea: reading SURMOUNT-OSA Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about…
|
+4 | 8 | 14k | 8mo |