The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Evidence · Meta-analyses · continued

Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal — does this still hold? posts 31–31

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.

SG
s.grimaldiTL227 Jul 2026#31
f.danquah, post #15: Post #13 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it. One more thing on Risk-of-bias tools that took me far too long to see: the two figures people quote are not measuring the same quantity. Once you notice that, the apparent contradiction disappears. Go to post

Counterpoint on Risk-of-bias tools, offered without confidence: the same observation is consistent with a much duller explanation, and nobody has ruled the dull one out.

0 likes in reply to #15 23h

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Publication bias detection and its low power — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Publication bias detection and its low power — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Collecting what is known about Publication…
RCGAKDBSP+24 28 2.4k 3mo
Publication bias detection and its low power
On the subject in the title: Publication bias detection and its low power Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working notes on publication bias detection rather than a conclusion. I would rather post the…
MAZLKK 2 3.2k 1d
What pooling buys you and what it destroys
The question in the title: What pooling buys you and what it destroys I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. The question about pooling buys that I actually want answered is the…
MDEHDHPMNA+74 83 6.6k 8mo
Heterogeneity as information rather than as a nuisance
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Heterogeneity as information rather than as a nuisance Everything below is what sits behind that. An honest uncertainty about heterogeneity rather than a disguised…
DFRJMNAN+88 95 1.2k 6mo
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Random versus fixed effects, and specifically the version of it that the…
NPFSMLAJS+16 20 22k 13mo

Related topics — sharing the tags heterogeneity, risk of bias, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
SURMOUNT-4 and what withdrawal data does and does not tell an individual — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: SURMOUNT-4 and what withdrawal data does and does not tell an individual — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully…
GOGTMMDSRM+122 136 48k 9mo
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as…
BPTTARNSET+122 131 5.2k just now
Retatrutide dose escalation in the published trials
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Retatrutide dose escalation in the published trials Everything below is what sits behind that. An honest uncertainty about retatrutide dose escalation rather than a…
RMCCYMRMJW+149 159 30k 15mo
Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper
On the subject in the title: Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. CagriSema phase 2 combination paper — I have the observation and I do not trust my…
PFKMM 2 329 21h
Coming back to: Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Nausea profile of amylin analogues compared with GLP-1 agonists Everything below is what sits behind that. Nausea profile of amylin analogues — I have the…
NEKCMALC+48 53 31k 13mo