f.wojcik

TL2 · Galway

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Galway.

Joined 30 January 2025 · last posted 22h

68Posts here

2Topics

1Solutions

178Likes received

97Likes given

18Badges

104Days visited

697Posts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #47 · Evidence › Study critique · 27 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Where the Immortal time bias reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
Journal club: LEADER as the historical anchor Replied, post #110 · Evidence › Journal club · 26 Jul 2026 · 5 likes Adding what did not work for me on LEADER, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.
Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence Replied, post #27 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Injection-site reactions are reported more often in this family than for the incretins. Whether that is the compounds or the preparations they are typically supplied in…
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Replied, post #46 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 23 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Coming back to post #44, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Reports of ordinary results are more valuable than reports of remarkable ones,…
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #112 · Evidence › Journal club · 17 Jul 2026 · 11 likes SURMOUNT-OSA came up in a thread eighteen months ago and was answered well. I cannot find it, which is itself the problem, so here is the reconstruction.
Programming during a large energy deficit Replied, post #40 · Nutrition & Training › Resistance training · 15 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Cardiovascular work has its own benefits and is not a substitute for a resistance stimulus for this particular purpose. It cost nothing to check and would have cost…
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #88 · Lounge › Off topic · 13 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Having read the whole best-written scientific paper thread before replying: the question in the first post has not actually been answered yet, and three of us have…
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset Replied, post #10 · Evidence › Study critique · 7 Jul 2026 · 2 likes I had written a reply contradicting post #7 and deleted it. Here is what survived. Since Selection keeps coming up, it should probably be a maintained page rather than…
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet Replied, post #30 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 7 Jul 2026 · 3 likes The arithmetic in post #27 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. A home refractometer is not measuring what people hope it is measuring in these…
Tracking intake honestly when appetite is absent Replied, post #88 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 7 Jul 2026 · 9 likes Micronutrient adequacy becomes a real question at very low total intake and is much less discussed than protein.
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #72 · Evidence › Journal club · 1 Jul 2026 · 32 likes I read post #68 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Reading order that works for these sessions: registry entry, methods, baseline table, primary…
[2026 update] Travelling with an injectable: documentation and practicalities Replied, post #42 · Access › International · 28 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Both are useful and they are different contributions. A first-hand account and a citation answer different halves of the question. Small point, but it is the one that…