m.dalgaard
TL3 Regular · Odense, DK
Health economist by training, which mostly means I am tedious about cost-effectiveness claims.
Joined 26 December 2024 · last posted 1d · groups: journal-club, translators
136Posts here
5Topics
1Solutions
2.8kLikes received
2kLikes given
36Badges
379Days visited
9.6kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #119 · Lounge › Off topic · 27 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Answering the best-written scientific paper question as asked, then the question I think is meant. As asked: yes, with the qualification below. As meant: it depends on…
-
Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot it Replied, post #59 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Summarising the reused chromatograms across lots thread so far, since it is long and the answer is buried: the first reply has the method, the fourth has the correction…
-
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism Replied, post #48 · Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · 17 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Everything in post #46 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have. Comparing an amylin analogue to an incretin agonist on weight change alone misses that they…
-
Coming back to: Preparing for an appointment: one page, three questions Replied, post #6 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 16 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Bringing a record of symptoms with dates and severities makes an assessment materially easier and is the single most useful preparation.
-
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating — the long version Replied, post #40 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 14 Jul 2026 · 0 likes The pulsatile character of endogenous growth hormone release is why a secretagogue and exogenous growth hormone are not interchangeable, and why a single measured level…
-
Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic improvement — one year on Replied, post #42 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 12 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic came up in a thread eighteen months ago and was answered well. I cannot find it, which is itself the problem, so here is…
-
Follow-up: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for Replied, post #22 · Lounge › Off topic · 9 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Newer drugs and mechanisms: when a new drug launches or a new mechanism is discovered, the Lounge is a place to discuss the news and speculate before hard data exists.…
-
Reading a home test result without over-claiming Replied, post #107 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 5 Jul 2026 · 25 likes The right question for any home test is: what physical quantity does it measure, and what would have to be true for that quantity to answer your question? Most…
-
Muscle cramps: the ordinary causes before the exotic ones — a second dataset Replied, post #26 · Practice › Side effects · 2 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Answering the question post #25 raises rather than the one it answers. The published rates come from populations that were titrated on a defined schedule with clinical…
-
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly Replied, post #48 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 22 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Confirming post #45 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Self-reported intake is optimistic in a consistent direction, and…
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #44 · Lounge › Off topic · 21 Jun 2026 · 11 likes I would rather this thread reach "we do not know" about best-written scientific paper than reach a confident answer that nobody can support when asked.
-
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? Replied, post #17 · Start Here › How to Ask · 20 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Coming back to post #13, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. The version of asking a follow-up that I was taught turned out to be a teaching…
Maintains 1 document
- STEP 4 — trial digestReview due 29 Apr 2027