r.erdogan

TL2 · Faro

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Faro.

Joined 22 January 2025 · last posted 5d

87Posts here

2Topics

1Solutions

1.6kLikes received

992Likes given

23Badges

263Days visited

5kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Coming back to: Preparing for an appointment: one page, three questions Replied, post #34 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 22 Jul 2026 · 17 likes Post #32 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction. A question phrased as "what would you want to see before considering X" is answerable and…
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? Replied, post #56 · Start Here › How to Ask · 16 Jul 2026 · 10 likes The arithmetic in post #54 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. The bit of asking a follow-up that nobody enjoys is that the answer changes…
Transit times by route, from a logged dataset Replied, post #9 · Sourcing › Logistics · 14 Jul 2026 · 9 likes The same route behaves differently in different months. A single good or bad experience is one sample from a distribution.
Submitting a sample: the process end to end Replied, post #81 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 14 Jul 2026 · 20 likes I came in to disagree and I am leaving without a disagreement.
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #40 · Practice › Interactions · 13 Jul 2026 · 30 likes A supplement is a drug for interaction purposes, and the fact that it is sold without a prescription tells you nothing about whether it interacts. The paperwork is…
Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic improvement — one year on Replied, post #32 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 11 Jul 2026 · 19 likes Nothing to add on the substance. Thank you for taking the question at face value.
The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for Replied, post #57 · Lounge › Off topic · 9 Jul 2026 · 14 likes Non-technical and offered in the right category: the best thing about a forum with no vote score is that the boring accurate answer sits at the same level as the…
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #75 · Lounge › Off topic · 7 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Where the best-written scientific paper reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never argued for.
Revisiting: Protein density versus volume when you cannot eat much Replied, post #38 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 6 Jul 2026 · 20 likes I read post #35 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Timing of protein: spreading protein intake across the day, with some at each meal, is more…
Programming during a large energy deficit Replied, post #27 · Nutrition & Training › Resistance training · 28 Jun 2026 · 5 likes Post #24 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to…
What a reversed-phase purity number actually is Replied, post #8 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 28 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Post #6 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. One more thing on reversed-phase purity number that took me far too long to see: the two…
Reading a home test result without over-claiming Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 14 Jun 2026 · 1 like Anything that changes colour is measuring a reaction, and reactions have interferents. A positive result in the presence of an excipient you did not expect is not…