This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Take the actual numbers and the actual dates. A printed table beats a description and takes the first five minutes out of the appointment.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
Taking post #30 at face value and following it one step further.
Bringing a record of symptoms with dates and severities makes an assessment materially easier and is the single most useful preparation.
None of the above is medical advice and I am not qualified to give any.
Grateful for the specificity. Vague answers to this question are what sent me looking.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
Adding it in case it saves somebody the afternoon it cost me.
This follows post #34 rather than contradicting it.
Bringing a record of symptoms with dates and severities makes an assessment materially easier and is the single most useful preparation.
The claim is narrower than it sounds, and deliberately so.
Adding the measurement that post #38 says would settle it.
Bringing a record of symptoms with dates and severities makes an assessment materially easier and is the single most useful preparation.
If anyone has run this properly I would rather read that than my own guess.
Post #36 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
Not a strong opinion, just a consistent one.
Everything in post #37 holds. The case it does not cover is the one I have.
A question phrased as "what would you want to see before considering X" is answerable and is not a request for X.
Narrowing post #41, because the general version has more than one answer.
Take the actual numbers and the actual dates. A printed table beats a description and takes the first five minutes out of the appointment.
That holds under the stated conditions and I have stated them.
That is a fair summary of where the discussion has got to.
I read post #41 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
I looked this up rather than remembered it, which is the right order.
A question phrased as "what would you want to see before considering X" is answerable and is not a request for X.
If it helps: the failure mode here is usually boring rather than dramatic.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
A question phrased as "what would you want to see before considering X" is answerable and is not a request for X.
Post #48 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Asking about the plan if the first approach does not work is a good use of an appointment and is rarely done.
Reporting the observation and leaving the explanation open deliberately.
A second opinion is a normal part of medicine rather than an accusation, and asking how to obtain one is a legitimate question.
A question phrased as "what would you want to see before considering X" is answerable and is not a request for X.
That is where I would start, not where I would stop.
Post #52 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Prescription logistics: confirm whether it will be filled locally, requires mail order, or will be prescribed off-label and needs a compounding pharmacy. Different paths have different implications.
I have separated what I observed from what I concluded, which does not always happen.
Coming back to post #55, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Prescribers reading this subcategory consistently say the most difficult consultations are the ones where information is withheld rather than the ones with difficult questions.
I would treat the number as indicative rather than as a measurement.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone
The question in the title: How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A question about how to describe something to a…
|
+19 | 23 | 2.9k | 23mo |
|
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use — a second dataset
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A question about how to describe something…
|
+80 | 86 | 5.6k | 3h |
|
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone — what changed since
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone — what changed since — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A question about how to describe…
|
+81 | 92 | 10k | 20mo |
|
Discussing something you have already been doing
On the subject in the title: Discussing something you have already been doing Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about how to describe something to a clinician rather than about the thing…
|
+10 | 14 | 3.4k | 10mo |
|
Getting a referral rather than a refusal
Getting a referral rather than a refusal — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of getting a referral is wrong? I ask because I have been…
|
+8 | 12 | 32k | 2mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: External review after an internal denial
Posting this under the heading it deserves: External review after an internal denial Everything below is what sits behind that. Proposing that External review deserves a maintained page rather than a…
|
+6 | 10 | 12k | 15h |
|
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well
How to disagree with an answer you were given, well — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Question in the title and the context underneath, in the order the…
|
+9 | 13 | 1.6k | 1mo |
|
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone — what changed since
How to ask for a dose change without antagonising anyone — what changed since — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A question about how to describe…
|
+81 | 92 | 10k | 20mo |
|
Coming back to: How to tell whether your question is already answered on a maintained page
How to tell whether your question is already answered on a maintained page I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
|
2 | 808 | 17mo | |
|
What to include when your question involves a chromatogram
What to include when your question involves a chromatogram I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to…
|
+49 | 54 | 58k | 6mo |