Topic summary
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated
This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 98, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
crossover_review, post #2: Whatever the answer on 40-week log turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, invite the correction. Go to post
Post #41 put the caveat in the right place and I want to underline it.
Menstrual cycle: for people who menstruate, weight can shift by several pounds across the cycle due to fluid retention and other factors. Noting cycle phase when weighing reduces apparent noise.
c.haddad, post #49: Confirming post #46 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. The best progress reports here read as records rather than as arguments, and that difference is visible within a sentence. Go to post
Nothing here is medical advice and a progress report is a description of what happened to one person under uncontrolled conditions.
e.kuusela, post #43: The arithmetic in post #42 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Maintenance series are the ones this subcategory needs most and receives least. The interesting questions all change once loss stops. Go to post
Rate of change matters more than the absolute number for most of the questions people ask about their own series.
Take it as a starting point and not as a specification.
Read the full topic (98 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings misleadOutcomes › Progress reports · 125 replies
- Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs hereOutcomes › Progress reports · 29 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold?
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting a small dataset on 40-week log. It is…
|
+1 | 5 | 14k | 2mo |
|
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about 18-month record on behalf of the question I keep seeing asked badly,…
|
+77 | 81 | 17k | 12h |
|
A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured Everything below is what sits behind that. I was wrong about plateau in a thread last spring and I would…
|
+27 | 31 | 7.2k | 3mo |
|
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead — one year on
On the subject in the title: Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about Seven-day rolling directly, because I have read four…
|
+78 | 88 | 16k | 5mo |
|
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here
On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that Reporting a disappointing outcome deserves a maintained page…
|
2 | 11k | 8mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, long read, data table
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Body composition category
DXA, BIA, ultrasound and the precision of each. Lean mass preservation during rapid loss. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
5 | 64k | 15mo | |
|
A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured — the long version
A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A narrow question about plateau, deliberately narrow, because…
|
+49 | 54 | 9.4k | 1mo |
|
Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules
Second pass at: Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…
|
+13 | 17 | 1.8k | 16mo |
|
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits
On the subject in the title: Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Working notes rather than a conclusion. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about blinding yourself. Everyone…
|
+40 | 44 | 33k | 5d |
|
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that…
|
+77 | 81 | 16k | 11h |