The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · Mass spectrometry

About the Mass spectrometry category

Pinned Wiki
DO
dr_okonkwoTL4 Moderator24 May 2026#1
Community wiki post. Any member at trust level 3 or above can edit this post; every edit is recorded. Last edited by dr_okonkwo on 25 May 2026.
  • 25 May 2026 — dr_okonkwo: Initial wiki conversion.
Editors: dr_okonkwo, mira.patel, hana.sato
Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

LC-MS and high-resolution MS, charge states, mass accuracy in ppm, and what identity confirmation does and does not establish.

This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted from what actually gets posted, edit it rather than starting a topic about it.

What belongs here

  • Questions specific to mass spectrometry, with the units and the context stated.
  • Reports and datasets, with the collection method stated.
  • Disagreement about the substance, conducted in public.

What belongs elsewhere

  • Anything urgent belongs in Safety, immediately, and not here.
  • Anything about how this site works belongs in Meta.
  • Requests for a maintained page belong in Wiki requests.

Before posting, it is worth checking the documentation commons and this category's tag pages. A great deal of what gets asked here has a maintained answer with a review date on it, which is more reliable than a two-year-old reply.

3 likes 2mo
OB
owen.bradyTL4 Moderator5 Jun 2026#2
Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

Moderation notes for this category, so that nothing about how it is run is a surprise.

Topics get moved into and out of here regularly. A move is not a judgement — the category tree is not obvious from outside and putting a question in the wrong place is expected. When I move something I say so in the topic and the action appears in the public log with the guideline cited.

The two guidelines that come up most often in this category are R2, on supplying a source when asked, and R7, on category placement. Neither is used punitively.

0 likes 2mo
LD
l.dialloTL213 Jun 2026#3

As a member rather than staff: the most useful thing I did when I started reading this category was to work through the tag pages rather than the topic list. The topic list shows you what is recent. The tags show you what is settled.

23 likes 1mo
BD
b.demirTL220 Jun 2026#4

Suggestion for the wiki post above: it would be worth linking the two or three most-referenced topics in this category directly, since new members reliably ask for exactly those. Happy to make the edit myself if nobody objects, with a revision note.

10 likes 1mo
RV
r.villalobosTL227 Jun 2026#5
l.diallo, post #3: As a member rather than staff: the most useful thing I did when I started reading this category was to work through the tag pages rather than the topic list. The topic list shows you what is recent. The tags show you what is settled. Go to post

Deamidation adds approximately one dalton and produces a species that frequently elutes very close to the parent. It is the hardest common impurity to see chromatographically and the easiest to see by mass.

I would be glad to be shown a cleaner way of putting this.

3 likes in reply to #3 1mo
OV
o.vogelTL24 Jul 2026#6

A mass match establishes that the measured mass is consistent with the proposed composition. It does not establish purity, sequence order, or the absence of an isomer, and all three are frequently claimed from it.

The confident version of this sentence would be wrong, so here is the hedged one.

0 likes 24d
MD
m.duarteTL210 Jul 2026 · edited#7

Post #3 and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction.

What mass accuracy establishes: the measured mass is consistent with a specific composition. What it does not establish: purity, sequence order, stereochemistry, or the absence of an isobaric species. Every one of those requires something else.

31 likes 18d
LA
l.aguirreTL216 Jul 2026#8

Taking post #7 at face value and following it one step further.

Sample preparation for mass spectrometry can itself introduce modifications, particularly oxidation. A finding at trace level may be telling you about the preparation rather than the material.

16 likes 12d
FF
f.fenwickTL3Regular22 Jul 2026#9

Second this, and I would have said it less carefully.

0 likes 6d
AP
ar.petrovTL228 Jul 2026#10

Post #7 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Positional isomers and epimers are mass-identical. Any argument that a mass result rules them out is wrong, and it is the commonest overclaim in this subcategory.

24 likes 6h

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
KCCIAMCDBV+108 125 1.5k 5mo
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
HKGVDWONW+20 24 1.7k 1d
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about Counter-ion content does not reconcile…
SORSLAFFOV 4 16k 4mo
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
JVBPSOOAK+56 60 5.2k 9mo
MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Two reports on the same lot, and…
ACCCNDVVB+34 39 21k 1mo

Related topics — sharing the tags LC-MS, high-resolution MS, mass error (ppm)

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold? Adducts keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because…
KBZYLVCETV+113 119 1.7k 3mo
Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope
Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. tirzepatide has a…
IDIAJV 2 63 10mo
Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass
On the subject in the title: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass Working notes rather than a conclusion. Something about counter-ion content does not reconcile and I would like a second pair…
JTFAIDGHIO+100 108 45k 12mo
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number
On the subject in the title: Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
BDSBCDAMBR+100 113 48k 13mo
[2026 update] Why mass spectrometry cannot tell you about an epimer
Why mass spectrometry cannot tell you about an epimer — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
GTAPFP 2 1k 8mo