The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 126, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
BV
b.vestergaardTL2 Solution11 Feb 2026#5
k.chukwu, post #1: Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. retatrutide has a monoisotopic mass close to 4731.3 Da. On an electrospray instrument I would expect to see the multiply charged series… Go to post

I read the opening post twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Purity and identity are different questions: LC-MS establishes that the species at a retention time has the expected mass. It does not establish how much of the sample is that species (that is what LC-UV purity answers).

12 likes in reply to #1 5mo
AL
a.lindholmTL211 Feb 2026#7

No disagreement from me. Posting only so the question does not look ignored.

29 likes 5mo
N
NLoughranTL3Regular12 Feb 2026#18

I had written a reply contradicting post #16 and deleted it. Here is what survived.

For a compound with no reference standard in circulation, an observed mass is much more useful than an assertion of agreement with a theoretical value nobody can check.

32 likes 5mo
JT
j.teixeiraTL212 Feb 2026#26
a.mwangi, post #3: The opening post and I disagree about the size of the effect, not about the direction. What mass accuracy establishes: the measured mass is consistent with a specific composition. What it does not establish: purity, sequence order, stereochemistry, or the absence of an isobaric species. Every one of those requires something else. Go to post

This follows post #25 rather than contradicting it.

Where I have landed on mass error in ppm, having got it wrong once in public: the direction is clear, the magnitude is not, and anyone quoting a precise magnitude has borrowed it from somewhere that did not measure it.

27 likes in reply to #3 5mo
RA
r.aldana_pharmdTL4Pharmacist13 Feb 2026#38

Source for the mass error in ppm figure, since it was asked for. It is in the discussion rather than the abstract, which is why the version circulating is stronger than the paper is.

Reading the surrounding paragraph is worth the two minutes. The authors are more careful than their summarisers.

29 likes 5mo
KP
k.perrinTL213 Feb 2026#39

Sample preparation for mass spectrometry can itself introduce modifications, particularly oxidation. A finding at trace level may be telling you about the preparation rather than the material.

I would rather be precise about what I do not know than vague about what I do.

27 likes 5mo
JW
journalclub_wrenTL3Regular13 Feb 2026#43

Right — I had this wrong and I am glad to have read it before it mattered.

27 likes 5mo
EK
ew.kuuselaTL215 Feb 2026#93

Calibration state at the time of the run determines whether the ppm figure means anything. A report that states when the instrument was last calibrated is unusual and is worth more than one that does not.

31 likes 5mo
MS
m.steinerTL215 Feb 2026#107

The arithmetic in post #104 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check.

Positional isomers and epimers are mass-identical. Any argument that a mass result rules them out is wrong, and it is the commonest overclaim in this subcategory.

32 likes 5mo

Read the full topic (126 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass
Second pass at: Counter-ion content and its effect on measured mass Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Something about Counter-ion content does not reconcile…
SORSLAFFOV 4 16k 4mo
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on 2 ppm…
BSNKSTMGMM+44 49 8.1k 1d
[2026 update] Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through
On the subject in the title: Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a…
DBBIATNAL+116 135 31k 3mo
MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it
MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
SVSLSTGBLM+2 6 2.7k 1d
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version
Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
TTRAK 2 47k 18mo

Related topics — sharing the tags LC-MS, high-resolution MS, MALDI-TOF

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation
Buffers, pH and why a formulation is a formulation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A formulation question rather than a pharmacological one, though the two…
BEVLGSODB+11 15 51k 21mo
[2026 update] Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through
On the subject in the title: Charge states for a 4 kDa peptide, worked through Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a…
DBBIATNAL+116 135 31k 3mo
Coming back to: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reading back through what has been written here about Oxidation and deamidation mass…
HFSLADAKTI+34 38 4.8k 10mo
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated Everything below is what sits behind that. Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, and specifically the version of…
AFJVIATNCS+67 76 21k 16mo
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to establish the boundary conditions on distinguishing a deletion…
RMLSMHMINM+121 129 25k 17mo