Taking post #118 at face value and following it one step further.
Adding what did not work for me on scheduled maintenance, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Taking post #118 at face value and following it one step further.
Adding what did not work for me on scheduled maintenance, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.
Scheduled maintenance notice. The site will be read-only for a short window; nothing will be lost and nothing needs doing at your end. If a post fails to submit during it, the draft survives.
Following, with nothing to contribute beyond having asked the same thing elsewhere.
This follows post #122 rather than contradicting it.
The claim about scheduled maintenance upthread is stronger than its source supports. I have read the source. The source says "associated with" and the post says "causes".
One question about the transition rather than the policy: what happens to topics that are in flight when it takes effect? The announcement is clear about posts and silent about drafts.
That is my reading. Someone else read the same page differently and was reasonable.
Worth saying publicly: stepping back cleanly and handing over is a service. Documents with an absent maintainer go wrong quietly, which is the worst way for them to go wrong.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trust level 3 requirements: a clarification
Trust level 3 requirements: a clarification — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Trust level 3 requirements, and specifically the version of it that the documentation does not…
|
+10 | 14 | 7k | 9mo |
|
A staff appointment, and what the role involves
On the subject in the title: A staff appointment, and what the role involves Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about staff appointment on behalf of the question I keep seeing asked badly,…
|
2 | 1.8k | 4mo | |
|
Guidelines revision: what changed and why
Guidelines revision: what changed and why Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I was wrong about guidelines revision in a thread last spring and I would like to…
|
+125 | 142 | 1.7k | 2y |
|
Revisiting: Moderation log format change
Revisiting: Moderation log format change Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Moderation log format change keeps being re-asked here and I think that is because…
|
+65 | 71 | 9.1k | 19mo |
|
[2026 update] Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable Everything below is what sits behind that. Scheduled maintenance: setting out the arithmetic in full, because I…
|
+18 | 22 | 400 | 8mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The five documentation pages worth reading before you post anything — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: The five documentation pages worth reading before you post anything — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on five documentation pages.…
|
2 | 24k | 1d | |
|
A certificate whose chromatogram axes do not match its stated method
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A certificate whose chromatogram axes do not match its stated method Everything below is what sits behind that. A narrow question about certificate whose…
|
+9 | 13 | 182 | 13mo |
|
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of Contributing data without…
|
2 | 58k | 17mo | |
|
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
On the subject in the title: Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of citation sweep results is…
|
+92 | 101 | 2.9k | 2mo |
|
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong
Why we ask for units every single time, with three examples of what goes wrong — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Counting it rather than describing it,…
|
+115 | 135 | 2.2k | 11d |