k.radich
TL2 · Graz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Graz.
Joined 14 November 2024 · last posted 3d
89 posts, newest first. Showing up to 150.
-
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #95 · Practice › Interactions · 25 Jul 2026 · 1 like Useful. I had the fact and not the reason, which turns out to be the important half.
-
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Replied, post #77 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 21 Jul 2026 · 23 likes Thank you for taking the time. That was more work than a reply usually is.
-
Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #63 · Start Here › Welcome · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Reading counts toward trust level, so lurking is not wasted. That is unusual and it is the reason the levels here track familiarity rather than volume. I looked this up…
-
Submitting a sample: the process end to end Replied, post #61 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 6 Jul 2026 · 19 likes Narrowing post #60, because the general version has more than one answer. Filing a mild objection to the consensus on submitting a sample. Mild because I might be…
-
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Replied, post #5 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 1 Jul 2026 · 13 likes Where I part company with post #4, and it is a narrow parting. Where the Detection wavelength discussion usually stalls is that nobody wants to say "I do not know" and…
-
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #30 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 26 Jun 2026 · 1 like Picking up post #29: that is the part I would want checked first. Two people in this thread mean different things by consumer-accessible tests and are disagreeing about…
-
Why retatrutide discussion here is more cautious than elsewhere — one year on Replied, post #13 · Compounds › Retatrutide · 23 Jun 2026 · 0 likes The version of retatrutide discussion that I was taught turned out to be a teaching simplification. Useful, and not true in the way I had assumed it was.
-
Micronutrient adequacy at low total intake Replied, post #30 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 8 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Adding the measurement that post #28 says would settle it. What I would check first on micronutrient adequacy is whether the thing being measured moved or whether the…
-
A checklist for reading a certificate in under two minutes Replied, post #36 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 8 Jun 2026 · 12 likes When method identifiers are missing: "reversed-phase HPLC" is less specific than "reversed-phase HPLC at 214 nm on a C18 column with a 10 to 40% acetonitrile gradient…
-
Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports — does this still hold? Replied, post #91 · Outcomes › Body composition · 8 Jun 2026 · 2 likes Comparison to published data: the trials reported mean fat and lean mass changes. Individual results vary around that mean. Being above or below average is not a sign…
-
A certificate whose chromatogram axes do not match its stated method — one year on Replied, post #84 · Sourcing › Red flags · 6 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Keep the two claims separate. "The result on this lot did not match the certificate" is a report that can be checked. "This supplier is dishonest" is an allegation…
-
Injecting into an area that has become firm: why not to Replied, post #19 · Practice › Administration · 5 Jun 2026 · 23 likes If you have to inject at a different time of day than usual, that is a much smaller perturbation than it feels for a weekly compound with a week-long half-life.
-
Bariatric surgery history: altered anatomy, altered expectations Replied, post #26 · Clinical › Special populations · 27 May 2026 · 1 like Bariatric surgery history would be much easier to settle if anyone reported the denominator. Almost nobody reports the denominator.
-
CJC-1295 with and without DAC: what the modification does Replied, post #66 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 25 May 2026 · 0 likes Reading back through the CJC-1295 threads from last year, the same three questions come up every time and only one of them has ever been answered properly. That seems…
-
[2026 update] A vial that will not fully dissolve: what to check and in what order Replied, post #59 · Practice › Reconstitution · 18 May 2026 · 27 likes Concentration is total mass divided by total volume, and everything else follows from that. Ten milligrams into two millilitres is five milligrams per millilitre, and…
-
Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour Replied, post #7 · Access › Shortages · 12 May 2026 · 28 likes Helpful, and short, which on this subject is harder than long.
-
Splitting an overlong document into two Replied, post #16 · Documentation › Wiki requests · 30 Apr 2026 · 23 likes A note on scope: what I am saying about splitting an overlong document applies to the case in the first post and I would not extend it further without checking.
-
Prescription portability between countries Replied, post #17 · Access › International · 26 Apr 2026 · 9 likes Customs practice varies between entry points within the same country, which is why two people in the same jurisdiction report different experiences honestly.
-
Pregnancy and pregnancy planning: contraindication and washout Replied, post #117 · Clinical › Special populations · 20 Apr 2026 · 20 likes Adding a data point of agreement rather than a data point.
-
[2026 update] 0.3 mL versus 0.5 mL versus 1 mL barrels: resolution matters Replied, post #45 · Devices › Syringes & needles · 20 Apr 2026 · 7 likes Thank you for taking the time. That was more work than a reply usually is.
-
Five questions in one post gets you one answer — how to split them Replied, post #59 · Start Here › How to Ask · 19 Apr 2026 · 21 likes Disagreement-style questions: "I read this and it contradicts what I heard here, which is right?" is answerable. "Is this a bad idea?" without giving the context is…
-
Foaming during reconstitution and whether it matters — the long version Replied, post #104 · Practice › Reconstitution · 19 Apr 2026 · 0 likes Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.
-
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters Replied, post #87 · Compounds › Tirzepatide · 18 Apr 2026 · 28 likes Where I part company with post #83, and it is a narrow parting. The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose in the sense that weight loss is minimal at that…
-
Blinding yourself: practical methods and their limits Replied, post #18 · Research Methods › N-of-1 designs · 15 Apr 2026 · 15 likes I have been on both sides of the blinding yourself argument in this category within eighteen months, which should tell you how strong the evidence for either side is.
-
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Replied, post #2 · Evidence › Journal club · 11 Apr 2026 · 7 likes The failure mode on STEP 1 is boring rather than dramatic. It is almost always the step everyone assumes was done correctly because it is too simple to get wrong.
-
Second pass at: Sleep apnoea improving and the equipment implications Replied, post #9 · Wellbeing › Sleep · 5 Apr 2026 · 5 likes The published data on sleep outcomes in this class is thinner than the volume of discussion, which is worth saying plainly. That is all I can say without guessing.
-
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since Replied, post #13 · Meta › Site feedback · 30 Mar 2026 · 9 likes Post #10 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Navigation problems: if you cannot find something you expected to exist, or the path to…
-
The "under review" status pill and when a moderator applies it Replied, post #37 · Evidence › Preprints · 25 Mar 2026 · 5 likes On post #34 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Reading a preprint properly means doing some of the reviewer's job: methods first, then whether the…
-
Sample handling between despatch and injection Started this topic · Analytics › Method validation · 25 Mar 2026 · 19 likes Sample handling between despatch and injection Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as…
-
Second pass at: Adsorptive losses at low concentration, and why dilute solutions are… Replied, post #69 · Practice › Storage & stability · 21 Mar 2026 · 16 likes The number people quote for Adsorptive losses is a central estimate presented without its interval, and the interval is wide enough that the estimate is nearly…
-
Splitting a weekly dose in two: the pharmacokinetic argument against Replied, post #15 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 8 Mar 2026 · 0 likes Reading rather than answering, but this is the post I would point somebody at.
-
Adducts: sodium, potassium, and the peak you did not expect — does this still hold? Replied, post #50 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 26 Feb 2026 · 0 likes Common adducts: sodium adds ≈22, potassium adds ≈38 compared to hydrogen. A [M+Na]+ peak is common and its mass is predictable from the base mass. Flagging that the…
-
Anaesthesia and elective surgery: the aspiration question Replied, post #31 · Practice › Interactions · 24 Feb 2026 · 0 likes Adding what did not work for me on anaesthesia and elective surgery, since the failures never get written up and they are half the useful information.
-
Why "dose equivalence" between different incretin analogues is a weak concept Replied, post #132 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 22 Feb 2026 · 7 likes Split dosing within a week is sometimes proposed to smooth tolerability. With a week-long half-life the concentration is already smooth, so what it would change is the…
-
Managing an unplanned gap in supply Replied, post #17 · Access › Shortages · 29 Jan 2026 · 22 likes Dose hold versus tapering: if a temporary shortage forces a gap, holding your dose and resuming when supply returns is different from gradually tapering. The two are…
-
Personal import allowances, compared — a second dataset Replied, post #58 · Access › International · 26 Jan 2026 · 0 likes Grateful for the specificity. Vague answers to this question are what sent me looking.
-
Reading an interaction checker output critically Replied, post #76 · Practice › Interactions · 26 Dec 2025 · 3 likes On reading an interaction checker output, the part that usually goes wrong is that the question is asked as though it has one answer. It has a range, and the width of…
-
Which panel is worth repeating and which is worth ignoring — a second dataset Replied, post #27 · Clinical › Bloodwork · 12 Dec 2025 · 9 likes Taking post #24 at face value and following it one step further. Counterpoint on panel, offered without confidence: the same observation is consistent with a much…
-
[2026 update] Storing lyophilised material long term: what governs the shelf life Replied, post #28 · Practice › Storage & stability · 27 Nov 2025 · 0 likes I would rather this thread reach "we do not know" about Storing lyophilised material long term than reach a confident answer that nobody can support when asked.
-
Severe gastroparesis and why this class is a poor fit — one year on Replied, post #9 · Safety › Contraindications · 21 Nov 2025 · 7 likes Worth separating two things that post #7 runs together. Asking a pharmacist to check a contraindication takes minutes and is more reliable than any thread, including…
-
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Started this topic · Outcomes › Progress reports · 18 Nov 2025 · 17 likes On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Proposing that Reporting a disappointing…
-
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial Replied, post #60 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 8 Nov 2025 · 26 likes Reading a colorimetric result at the wrong time is the commonest procedural error. Development is time-dependent and the window is usually narrow. I would be interested…
-
Pharmaceutical compounding rules, summarised from primary sources — a second dataset Replied, post #17 · Sourcing › Regulatory · 5 Nov 2025 · 0 likes On post #14 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. The reason Pharmaceutical compounding rules is hard to answer is that the obvious measurement and the…
-
Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI — does this… Replied, post #4 · Compounds › Tirzepatide · 16 Oct 2025 · 23 likes Answering the question the opening post raises rather than the one it answers. The five maintenance doses in the tirzepatide programme give a genuine dose-response…
-
Second pass at: How to ask a question when you cannot say why you are asking it Replied, post #21 · Start Here › How to Ask · 8 Oct 2025 · 0 likes When you quote a figure from somewhere else, say where from. Not as a formality — the answer frequently depends on whether the number came from a certificate, an…
-
Meeting a protein target on a suppressed appetite Replied, post #24 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 26 Sep 2025 · 0 likes Protein supplements: whey, casein, and plant-based protein powders can help hit targets when whole-food intake is limited by appetite. Protein quality (all essential…
-
Payment method and the leverage it gives you, ranked Replied, post #65 · Sourcing › Payments · 24 Sep 2025 · 0 likes A definition problem is doing most of the work in this payment method discussion. Once the term is pinned down I suspect the disagreement mostly goes away and what is…
-
Hypertension improvement and when medication needs revisiting Replied, post #58 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 13 Sep 2025 · 21 likes A methods point on hypertension improvement rather than a substantive one: if the comparison is not like for like, the difference you are measuring is the difference in…
-
Semaglutide versus liraglutide head to head: reading STEP 8 carefully Replied, post #54 · Compounds › Semaglutide · 7 Sep 2025 · 10 likes The 165 to 184 hour range: that is roughly 7 to 7.6 days, which is why the weekly schedule works. Below 4 half-lives you are not approaching steady state yet, which is…
-
Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI Replied, post #33 · Compounds › Tirzepatide · 29 Aug 2025 · 0 likes Post #31 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Dual agonism versus dose: how much of tirzepatide's effect is the GIP component and how…
-
The nausea timeline across the first four weeks, with a tabulated log Replied, post #9 · Practice › Side effects · 22 Aug 2025 · 0 likes On nausea timeline, I would rather understate and be corrected upward than overstate and be quoted. That is a house style here and it is a good one.
-
Coming back to: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated Replied, post #22 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 20 Jul 2025 · 9 likes An acylated peptide has a mass that reflects the modification, so comparing against the mass of the unmodified backbone gives a mismatch that is not an error. A single…
-
Domestic fridge temperature mapping: a cheap experiment — what changed since Replied, post #141 · Devices › Cold chain · 12 Jul 2025 · 19 likes Insulation performance depends on the mass of the coolant more than on the thickness of the box. A large pack in a modest box outperforms a small pack in a good one.
-
Gauge and length selection for subcutaneous injection Replied, post #8 · Devices › Syringes & needles · 29 Jun 2025 · 0 likes Confirming post #6 from a second method, which matters more than confirming it from a second person. Adding a small correction to the gauge and length selection summary…
-
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis Replied, post #71 · Evidence › Study critique · 2 Jun 2025 · 13 likes Generalisability and validity are separate axes. A trial can be internally impeccable and still tell you nothing about the person asking.
-
Second pass at: Pen dose counters: what a click does and does not guarantee Replied, post #47 · Devices › Pens & autoinjectors · 23 May 2025 · 3 likes Needle changes between doses are specified for a reason and the reasons are dose accuracy and sterility rather than comfort alone.
-
A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Replied, post #61 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 19 May 2025 · 17 likes Do not adjust a reported figure. Post what the laboratory said and put your interpretation in a separate sentence.
-
Journal club: SURMOUNT-4 and continuation versus withdrawal — a second dataset Replied, post #35 · Evidence › Journal club · 19 May 2025 · 0 likes I think the SURMOUNT-4 and continuation versus withdrawal question is answerable and has not been answered, which is a more optimistic position than most of this thread.
-
Pregnancy as an absolute contraindication Replied, post #74 · Safety › Contraindications · 19 May 2025 · 3 likes Answering the question post #72 raises rather than the one it answers. Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma, or multiple endocrine neoplasia type…
-
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis Replied, post #39 · Evidence › Study critique · 17 May 2025 · 13 likes A note on how claim built gets discussed rather than on claim built itself: the confident posts get the replies and the careful ones get ignored, and the careful ones…
-
Criticising the method without criticising the authors Replied, post #62 · Evidence › Study critique · 6 May 2025 · 0 likes Adding the measurement that post #61 says would settle it. Worth stating the null on criticising the method without criticising before we explain it: the observation…
-
Asking about a compound your prescriber has not heard of Replied, post #29 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 1 May 2025 · 21 likes Answering the question post #25 raises rather than the one it answers. If time runs out, asking what to do next — book again, phone, message — is better than leaving…
-
Reading a trial's population section before its results — does this still hold? Replied, post #19 · Evidence › Trials · 18 Apr 2025 · 22 likes Trial duration determines what can be observed. A weight-change trajectory at 40 weeks and at 72 weeks are different observations and both get quoted as the result.…
-
Carryover and the ghost peak from last week's standard Replied, post #86 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 11 Apr 2025 · 26 likes The arithmetic on carryover is the easy part and it is where the errors are, which is an uncomfortable combination. Show your working and someone will catch it.
-
Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later Replied, post #65 · Start Here › Welcome · 3 Apr 2025 · 19 likes Marked solutions are the site's way of saying that someone asked a good question and someone else gave an answer that actually worked. It is not a competition and it…
-
Requesting a translation of an existing page Replied, post #4 · Documentation › Wiki requests · 24 Mar 2025 · 30 likes The arithmetic in post #3 is right; the assumption feeding it is the part to check. Requests for a page summarising a supplier are declined, because that is what the…
-
Follow-up: Tesamorelin has an approved indication — what that changes about the evidence Replied, post #30 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 24 Mar 2025 · 9 likes On Tesamorelin: the maintained page in the documentation commons covers the general case with citations and a review date, which is more reliable than any reply here…
-
Maintainer handover: how it works Replied, post #76 · Meta › Wiki maintenance · 19 Mar 2025 · 19 likes The question underneath maintainer handover is usually "how would I tell?" rather than "what is true?", and that one has a method attached to it. Write down what you…
-
What SELECT changed about how semaglutide is discussed, and what it did not Replied, post #44 · Compounds › Semaglutide · 18 Mar 2025 · 8 likes Albumin binding is not a unique structural feature and nothing in the class lacks it, but the reversibility matters. Semaglutide binds albumin covalently through a…
-
Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1 Replied, post #79 · Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · 11 Mar 2025 · 31 likes Thank you for taking the time. That was more work than a reply usually is.
-
Second pass at: Regression to the mean in progress reports Replied, post #68 · Research Methods › Statistics · 26 Feb 2025 · 33 likes This follows post #65 rather than contradicting it. Bayesian and frequentist analyses answer different questions and both are legitimate. What matters is that the…
-
A page that has drifted out of date and needs a maintainer Replied, post #68 · Documentation › Wiki requests · 24 Feb 2025 · 0 likes Post #67 describes the usual case. This is about the unusual one. Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked…
-
A 5 mg vial and a 0.25 mg dose: the arithmetic in full — the long version Replied, post #31 · Practice › Reconstitution · 11 Feb 2025 · 0 likes Agreed, and I will stop repeating the version of this I had been repeating.
-
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — a second dataset Replied, post #82 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 9 Feb 2025 · 0 likes Coming back to post #81, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. High heterogeneity is the finding rather than a nuisance to be minimised. If the…
-
Random versus fixed effects: choosing rather than defaulting — a second dataset Replied, post #61 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 6 Feb 2025 · 1 like Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.
-
What changed in 2026, by region Replied, post #105 · Access › International · 28 Jan 2025 · 10 likes I read post #102 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Regulatory position dates: a regulatory position is only current as of when it was written.…
-
Follow-up: Individual participant data versus aggregate data Replied, post #100 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 11 Jan 2025 · 10 likes Worth separating two things that post #98 runs together. Something worth flagging about Individual participant data versus aggregate: the strongest-sounding claims in…
-
Revisiting: Semaglutide formulation: what is in the licensed product besides the peptide Replied, post #59 · Compounds › Semaglutide · 30 Dec 2024 · 0 likes Thank you — that answers what I came here to find out.
-
Gallbladder disease risk with rapid weight loss Replied, post #49 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 27 Dec 2024 · 2 likes Obstructive sleep apnoea: SURMOUNT-OSA used an objective endpoint, the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Reduction was substantial. Whether the benefit is weight loss or a direct…
-
Oral semaglutide bioavailability and its variability between people — a second dataset Replied, post #3 · Compounds › Oral incretins · 24 Dec 2024 · 0 likes Trying to state the Oral semaglutide bioavailability position in a way that someone who disagrees would recognise as fair, because I do not think the version in this…
-
Body image changing more slowly than the body Replied, post #42 · Wellbeing › Mental health · 15 Dec 2024 · 0 likes This follows post #41 rather than contradicting it. Expectations set by other people's reported trajectories are a documented source of distress, and the trajectories…
-
Follow-up: Oral contraceptives and delayed emptying: what the data shows Replied, post #29 · Practice › Interactions · 7 Dec 2024 · 0 likes Where I part company with post #27, and it is a narrow parting. Oral medications versus time: if you take an oral medication 30 minutes before semaglutide (which slows…
-
EMA product information as a primary source — does this still hold? Replied, post #45 · Regional › European Union · 16 Nov 2024 · 0 likes Answering the question post #41 raises rather than the one it answers. France: ANSM implements EU framework. Reimbursement has been narrower for weight management.…
-
Promotion criteria, and the one that stops most nominations Replied, post #90 · Documentation › Doc review · 19 Oct 2024 · 0 likes Review of promoted topics: when a topic is nominated for promotion to a maintained documentation page, the draft is posted here. Community review happens before…
-
Transit times by route, from a logged dataset — the long version Replied, post #17 · Sourcing › Logistics · 3 Oct 2024 · 12 likes The practical version of Transit times is three sentences long. The rigorous version is three pages and reaches the same conclusion with the conditions attached.
-
Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding Started this topic · Sourcing › Red flags · 21 Sep 2024 · 1 like Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Filing a…
-
Correlation in a self-tracked dataset: what it can support Replied, post #119 · Research Methods › Statistics · 24 Aug 2024 · 24 likes I read post #115 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Where the correlation reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the…
-
Second pass at: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis Replied, post #15 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 29 Jul 2024 · 22 likes Where the field-by-field walk through a certificate reasoning breaks down for me is the step from the group result to the individual case. That step is almost never…
-
Where the four-week escalation interval comes from, and what it is not Replied, post #11 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 1 Jun 2024 · 28 likes Where I have landed on four-week escalation interval, having got it wrong once in public: the direction is clear, the magnitude is not, and anyone quoting a precise…